Attorney Brad Litchfield

Brad ushered in great advice and support during this emotional and serious decision making process and I am deeply grateful. He is so kind, understanding and patient. I will always be grateful for Brad and his paralegal Dawn for their work with me.

Brad is one of the kindest more empathetic people I know. he cares deeply our his client's and their families. Kids come first with Brad. He has an outstanding knowledge of the law and is a good person.

If I could give 10 stars out of five, I would. I was involved in a civil case in which my 15 year old son was expected to testify. My son was very nervous about this and so was I. Brad Litchfield accepted the case and we feel so fortunate to have been in his care. I feel certain my case was not the most important matter in his caseload, but he always made me and my son feel as though it was. It was a great pleasure to meet him and to see how professionally and empathetically he handled our case. He is clearly a caring and compassionate person and was respectful to everyone involved. Importantly, I appreciate that he at all times made my son feel informed, at ease, safe, and cared for. And, of course, he won our case!

Bradley is a great man and a great attorney. He helped me so much through my journey and helped make things right! He was above and beyond everything I expected and made me feel like family. I would recommend Brad to anyone going through a hardship who needs professional help!

GREAT advice and guidance

I spent $10,000 while brad Litchfield investigated 'what happened'.And then , at his suggestion and my expense, he hired an 'expert' for$5000 and an investigator for 4 more thousand. $25,000 later , thelawyer I ended up with told me in 2 minutes, that 'what happened' isnot even permissible in court, only whether or not I am an employer.So all that 'investigating was a little prematture. And in fact,was never used. Brad must have figured that out at some point because he never even listened to the tapes from the investigator.( at least I didn't see it in the list of what he did in the bills) When I called Brad asking him if it s true that workers comp hadpaid the claimant- Jeff- money, instead of calling workers comp tofind out, he called the claimants lawyer who misinformed him and hethen he misinformed me. Brad had me also hire Zack as an expert on workers claim. I endedup spending a bunch of money as they conferred with each other. Ithought it was a little crazy and brad told me that no one specializesin both, that I really have to pay 'double, essentially- as theyconferred with each other, both came to meetings to tell me what wasgoing on, etc. and I had to have both of them cause they each haddifferent information. Another thing I do not think was true. But Ifelt a little captivated because they knew so much. Little did I knowthat most of what ' they knew' was irrelevant. At least 4 times, I told him that even tho the claimant's lawyertold him something , I still believed that claimantthe hadn't gotten anymoney and asked him to check. At least 4 times he said he would anddidn't. Then, Brad and Zack spent more money and came up with what theycalled the 'donut hole'. Which essentially means, I believe, that if Ican settle before workers comp pays out, they they do not need to beinvolved. After already asking 3 times, brad said 'both Zack and Iwill call the next working day.' I don't know if Zack did , but Bradcertainly did not. Zack called and said he never heard back. Butwhen my mom called, they called her back the next day . And when Icalled , they also called me the next day. I finally got theinformation I had been asking the lawyers when after asking for months, I finally called and got the information I needed in less than 24hours from the time I decided to find out. But it was too late bythen. I also asked repeatedly if 'facts matter' because I spent hourspiecing the information together. They don't and I never found thatout until my newest lawyer, bill told me. In the meantime., Brad sentthe information I pieced together to see if the 'expert' agreed. Hedid and charged me another $500. Not that it matters. ( as well, ofcourse of the price of sending the info ,reading the response andforwarding it to me. When Brad talked to the claimant's lawyer, he gave him a couple of money amounts that I would be responsible for. I asked him what thoseamounts meant . After asking a few times , he said he didn't know.Or maybe that was Zack. Anyway, no one knew.Brad made a date to have a mediation, with the claimant's lawyer,the claimant's lawyer gave a beginning settlement amount that wasastounding. I said I didn't know if I would walk into a mediationstarting at that amount. Brad shared that with the lawyer who saidessentially, don't worry. And he passed that onto me When my newlawyer, bill came on., within a week, he called the claimant's lawyerand they agreed to a lower beginning price. He said he was having alittle extra problem because Zack didn't write a 'contest' correctly,which was hindering a bit. So I spent over $30,000 and a year before I quit with Brad litchfield and Zack Mittge. My new lawyer is about one third, and in a few months settled the case for less than half of what these guys were suggesting,